说明：本页内容基于付款人（Terry）的陈述与提供的材料整理，属于一方主张。非事实认定，不构成法律建议。仅使用化名。完整地址与识别信息已做必要省略或概括。
Note: Content based on statements and materials provided by the payor (Terry). Party assertion only. Not a finding of fact. Not legal advice. Aliases used.
Terry自述：仅MacBook一项就给了四台；大大小小的电脑、手机合计十余台。这些构成长期物质支持的一部分。
Terry states that he alone provided four MacBooks, and in total more than a dozen computers and phones of various sizes. These formed part of a longer pattern of material support.
位于温哥华 1065 W 72nd Ave 的大型Condo，完全由Terry购买（Terry支付全额首付款），并提供给Lily与Harry母子居住。截至2026年10月，全部贷款已还清。目前该房产仅由Lily及其男友（未婚夫）居住；因两人居住显然过大，一直处于出租状态。
The large condo at 1065 W 72nd Ave, Vancouver, was purchased entirely by Terry (he paid the full down payment) and provided for Lily and Harry to reside in. By October 2026 the mortgage was fully paid off. It is currently occupied only by Lily and her boyfriend/fiancé; being clearly too large for two people, it has been rented out.
Lily为北京大学博士后毕业，英语流利，在加拿大生活约20年。目前在温哥华的加拿大荣耀移民有限公司（Canada Glory Immigration Ltd.）从事移民业务，担任全职办公室主任/合伙人。Terry粗略估计其年收入不低于5万加元。Harry据称有加拿大儿童福利金，并告知Terry他一直在麦当劳打工。
Lily holds a postdoctoral degree from Peking University, is fluent in English, and has lived in Canada for about 20 years. She works full-time as office director/partner at Canada Glory Immigration Ltd. in Vancouver. Terry roughly estimates her annual income at not less than CAD 50,000. Harry is said to receive Canadian child benefits and has told Terry that he works at McDonald’s.
根据Terry的判断，Lily持续向前夫索要大额款项：去年约8万加元，今年约5.6万美元。可能性较大的解释包括：（1）准备与现任未婚夫结婚；（2）此前有抑郁病史，现在是否已产生药物依赖。以上均为一方推测，缺乏独立医学或财务核实。
According to Terry’s assessment, Lily has continued to demand large sums from her former spouse: approximately CAD 80,000 last year and USD 56,000 this year. Plausible explanations he advances include: (1) preparation to marry her current fiancé; (2) prior depression that may now involve substance dependence. These remain one party’s speculation without independent medical or financial verification.
Terry认为，在已提供大量设备、已还清的房产、以及长期汇款的背景下，继续简单地向Lily支付大额现金（尽管每次借口均为“抚养费”），是最不明智的行为。其实际效果可能相当于“提油救火”与“剜肉补疮”——既无法解决结构性问题，又进一步削弱支付方自身的可持续能力。
Terry concludes that, against the background of substantial equipment already provided, a fully paid-off property, and long-term remittances, simply continuing to give large cash sums to Lily (even when framed each time as “support”) is the least prudent course. The practical effect may amount to “pouring oil on the fire” and “cutting one’s own flesh to patch a wound”—neither resolving the structural issues nor preserving the payor’s sustainable capacity.
标准化执行程序以单一命令与零支付台账为输入，不会自动抵扣前期资本性投入与设备。是否构成有效抵扣、以及持续义务是否仍存在，属于适当论坛依据原始记录与适用法律决定的事项。
Standardized enforcement pipelines take a single order and a zero-payment ledger as inputs; they do not automatically credit prior capital contributions or equipment. Whether credit is available and whether ongoing obligations still exist are questions for the appropriate forum based on original records and governing law.